Hi Antoine,
Could you clarify what you mean by:

> Given our current resource utilization on Github Actions, it seems that
> even a non-auto-scaling setup could be useful.


I could interpret it in a couple of ways ...

Thanks,
Micah

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 7:36 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:

>
> Le 13/03/2020 à 01:45, Brian Hulette a écrit :
> > * What kind of devops tooling would be appropriate to provision and
> > manage the instances, scaling up and down based on need?
> > * What CI/CD platform would be appropriate to dispatch work to the
> > cloud nodes (taking into consideration the high costs of sysadmin, and
> > seeking to minimize nodes sitting unused)?
> >
> > I looked into solutions for running CI/CD workers on GCP a (very) little
> > bit and just wanted to shared some findings.
> > Appveyor claims it can auto-scale GCE instances [1] but I don't think it
> > would go beyond 5 concurrent "self-hosted" jobs [2]. Would that be a
> > problem?
> > BuildKite has documentation about running agents on a scalable GKE
> cluster
> > [3], but unfortunately no way to auto-scale based on the backlog. We
> could
> > maybe roll our own/contribute something based on their AWS scaler [4].
>
> Given our current resource utilization on Github Actions, it seems that
> even a non-auto-scaling setup could be useful.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>

Reply via email to