Hi Kou,
Sure. I will let you know.

Regards,
Projjal

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020, at 2:20 AM, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Hi Projjal,
> 
> > Let me test the change by running it with Dremio.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > Will update if there are any issues.
> 
> It means that we can move forward if we don't get any
> responses from you in a week (long? short?), right?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
> 
> In <[email protected]>
>  "Re: [Gandiva] LLVM version" on Mon, 03 Feb 2020 11:26:43 +0530,
>  "Projjal Chanda" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Kou,
> > Let me test the change by running it with Dremio. Will update if there are 
> > any issues.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Projjal
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020, at 9:11 AM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> >> hi Kou,
> >> 
> >> Since nearly 2 weeks have passed, and the changes do not seem too
> >> risky, absent more comments I think it's safe to move forward with the
> >> upgrade.
> >> 
> >> - Wes
> >> 
> >> On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:55 PM Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Does Gandiva have any policy about LLVM version?
> >> >
> >> > The current Gandiva requires LLVM 7. Other LLVM versions
> >> > aren't supported. But the latest LLVM is 9. Can we upgrade
> >> > LLVM?
> >> >
> >> > Homebrew provides LLVM 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 but doesn't accept
> >> > apache-arrow package that depends outdated LLVM:
> >> >
> >> > https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/42385
> >> >
> >> > It means that apache-arrow package on Homebrew can't enable
> >> > Gandiva until we upgrade LLVM to the latest version.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > We have a pull request that upgrades supported LLVM to 8:
> >> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6266
> >> >
> >> > In the pull request, Wes mentioned to Gandiva developers but
> >> > there are no responses.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > In the pull request, there are no Gandiva changes. So we
> >> > will be able to support LLVM 7 and 8 without any #ifdef.
> >> > Can we support multiple LLVM versions? Or should we support
> >> > only one LLVM version?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I think that we can consider C++ tools provided by LLVM such
> >> > as clang-format separately. We will be able to use different
> >> > LLVM versions for Gandiva and C++ tools. For example, we
> >> > will be able to use LLVM 8 for Gandiva and LLVM 7 for
> >> > clang-format at the same time by improving our CMake
> >> > configuration.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > --
> >> > kou
> >> 
> 

Reply via email to