Hey David,

I think this proposal makes a lot of sense. I like it and the possibility
of remote compute via arrow buffers. One thing that would help me would be
a concrete example of the API in a real life use case. Also, what would the
client experience be in terms of sync vs asyc? Would the client block till
the bidirectional call return ie c = flight.vector_mult(a, b) or would the
client wait to be signaled that computation was done. If the later how is
that different from a DoPut then DoGet? I suppose that this could be
implemented without extending the RPC interface but rather by a
function/util?


Best,

Ryan

On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 9:24 PM David Li <li.david...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We've been using Flight quite successfully so far, but we have
> identified a new use case on the horizon: being able to both send and
> retrieve Arrow data within a single RPC call. To that end, I've
> written up a proposal for a new RPC method:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hh-3Z0hK5PxyEYFxwVxp77jens3yAgC_cpp0TGW-dcw/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Please let me know if you can't view or comment on the document. I'd
> appreciate any feedback; I think this is a relatively straightforward
> addition - it is essentially "DoPutThenGet".
>
> This is a format change and would require a vote. I've decided to
> table the other format change I had proposed (on DoPut), as it doesn't
> functionally change Flight, just the interpretation of the semantics.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>


-- 

Ryan Murray  | Principal Consulting Engineer

+447540852009 | rym...@dremio.com

<https://www.dremio.com/>
Check out our GitHub <https://www.github.com/dremio>, join our community
site <https://community.dremio.com/> & Download Dremio
<https://www.dremio.com/download>

Reply via email to