> > > > > It was my impression that we had workable solutions for using Result in > at > > least Python and Glib/Ruby (I'm don't know about R). > > In Python we do (though it needed a C++-side helper). >
OK, so what could more context be provided on: > From the discussion in the sync call, it seems reasonable to require that: > Public APIs which are likely to be directly wrapped in a binding should not > use Result<> to the exclusion of Status. An equivalent Status API should > always be provided for ease of binding. Thanks, Micah On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:42 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > Le 03/10/2019 à 06:13, Micah Kornfield a écrit : > > > > It was my impression that we had workable solutions for using Result in > at > > least Python and Glib/Ruby (I'm don't know about R). > > In Python we do (though it needed a C++-side helper). > > Regards > > Antoine. >
