+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, 7:43 AM Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:

>
> Sorry, had forgotten to send my vote on this.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:42:33 -0500
> Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > As we've been discussing [1], there is a need to introduce 4 bytes of
> > padding into the preamble of the "encapsulated IPC message" format to
> > ensure that the Flatbuffers metadata payload begins on an 8-byte
> > aligned memory offset. The alternative to this would be for Arrow
> > implementations where alignment is important (e.g. C or C++) to copy
> > the metadata (which is not always small) into memory when it is
> > unaligned.
> >
> > Micah has proposed to address this by adding a
> > 4-byte "continuation" value at the beginning of the payload
> > having the value 0xFFFFFFFF. The reason to do it this way is that
> > old clients will see an invalid length (what is currently the
> > first 4 bytes of the message -- a 32-bit little endian signed
> > integer indicating the metadata length) rather than potentially
> > crashing on a valid length. We also propose to expand the "end of
> > stream" marker used in the stream and file format from 4 to 8
> > bytes. This has the additional effect of aligning the file footer
> > defined in File.fbs.
> >
> > This would be a backwards incompatible protocol change, so older Arrow
> > libraries would not be able to read these new messages. Maintaining
> > forward compatibility (reading data produced by older libraries) would
> > be possible as we can reason that a value other than the continuation
> > value was produced by an older library (and then validate the
> > Flatbuffer message of course). Arrow implementations could offer a
> > backward compatibility mode for the sake of old readers if they desire
> > (this may also assist with testing).
> >
> > Additionally with this vote, we want to formally approve the change to
> > the Arrow "file" format to always write the (new 8-byte) end-of-stream
> > marker, which enables code that processes Arrow streams to safely read
> > the file's internal messages as though they were a normal stream.
> >
> > The PR making these changes to the IPC documentation is here
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4951
> >
> > Please vote to accept these changes. This vote will be open for at
> > least 72 hours
> >
> > [ ] +1 Adopt these Arrow protocol changes
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 I disagree because...
> >
> > Here is my vote: +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wes
> >
> > [1]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8440be572c49b7b2ffb76b63e6d935ada9efd9c1c2021369b6d27786@%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E
> >
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to