Agreed with Wes.
Regards Antoine. Le 14/08/2019 à 20:30, Wes McKinney a écrit : > For the record, I don't think we should hold a major release hostage > if we aren't able to complete various feature milestones in time. > Since it's been about 5-6 weeks since 0.14.0 we're coming close to the > desired 8-10 week timeline for major releases, so if we need to have > 0.16.0 prior to 1.0.0, I think that is OK also. > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:45 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:43 AM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> is there anything else that has come up that >>>> definitely needs to happen before we can release again? >>> >>> We need to decide on a way forward for LargeList, LargeBinary, etc, types... >>> >> >> Do these need to be dependent on the 64-bit array length discussion? >> They seem somewhat orthogonal to me. If we have to release 0.15.0 >> without the Java side of these, that's OK with me, since reaching >> format implementation completeness is more of a 1.0.0 concern >> >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:27 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> hi folks, >>>> >>>> Since there have been a number of fairly serious issues (e.g. >>>> ARROW-6060) since 0.14.1 that have been fixed I think we should start >>>> planning of the next major release. Note that we still have some >>>> format-related work (the Flatbuffers alignment issue) that ought to be >>>> resolved (not a small task since it affects 4 or 5 implementations), >>>> but aside from that, is there anything else that has come up that >>>> definitely needs to happen before we can release again? >>>> >>>> I would say cutting a release somewhere around the US Labor Day >>>> holiday (~the week after or so) would be called for. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Wes >>>>
