Sounds reasonable to me.
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 5:55 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > No more opinions? > > If there are no more opinions, we'll use the current > SO versioning schema committed by > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4801 for 1.0.0. The > current versioning schema is the following: > > * 1.0.0 -> libarrow.100.0.0 > * 1.1.0 -> libarrow.101.0.0 > * 1.2.0 -> libarrow.102.0.0 > > I'll update .deb package names when we decide this. > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In <cahm19a6iefcxshhctvnccqzqz4ehncaq8mj-48lfxhzdf9j...@mail.gmail.com> > "Re: [DISCUSS] C++ SO versioning with 1.0.0" on Thu, 4 Jul 2019 13:55:03 > +0200, > Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Created a PR with the versioning scheme described by @Kou. > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4801 > > > > We can change later (but before the next release) to unblock > > the failing CI builds. > > > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 12:51 PM Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 09:50:10 +0200 > >> Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Could We add a temporary solution and perhaps change the versioning > >> schema > >> > later? > >> > I'm asking because all of our c++ based CI builds are failing now. > >> > >> Wow, thanks for pointing out. > >> Indeed: > >> https://travis-ci.org/apache/arrow/builds/554118250 > >> > >> """ > >> CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:47 (message): > >> Need to implement SO version generation for Arrow 1.0+ > >> -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! > >> """ > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Antoine. > >> > >> > >>
