+1 (binding)

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:34 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:33 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In a recent mailing list discussion [1] Micah Kornfield has proposed
> > to add new list and variable-size binary and unicode types to the
> > Arrow columnar format with 64-bit signed integer offsets, to be used
> > in addition to the existing 32-bit offset varieties. These will be
> > implemented as new types in the Type union in Schema.fbs (the
> > particular names can be debated in the PR that implements them):
> >
> > LargeList
> > LargeBinary
> > LargeString [UTF8]
> >
> > While very large contiguous columns are not a principle use case for
> > the columnar format, it has been observed empirically that there are
> > applications that use the format to represent datasets where
> > realizations of data can sometimes exceed the 2^31 - 1 "capacity" of a
> > column and cannot be easily (or at all) split into smaller chunks.
> >
> > Please vote whether to accept the changes. The vote will be open for at
> > least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the additions to the columnar format
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not accept the changes because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wes
> >
> > [1]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8088eca21b53906315e2bbc35eb2d246acf10025b5457eccc7a0e8a3@%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E
>

Reply via email to