+1 (binding)

In <a2df0b62-e60c-d611-4933-504ea87fb...@python.org>
  "[VOTE] Proposed change to Arrow Flight protocol: endpoint URIs" on Mon, 8 
Apr 2019 20:36:26 +0200,
  Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:

> 
> Hello,
> 
> David Li has proposed to make the following change to the Flight gRPC
> service definition, as explained in this document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Eps9eHvBc_qM8nRsTVwVCuWwHoEtQ-a-8Lv5dswuQoM/
> 
> The proposed change is to replace (host, port) pairs to identify
> endpoints with RFC 3986-compliant URIs.  This will help describe with
> much more flexibility how a given Flight stream can be reached, for
> example by allowing different transport protocols (gRPC over TLS or Unix
> sockets can be reasonably implemented, but in the future we may also
> want to implement transport protocols that are not gRPC-based, for
> example a REST protocol directly over HTTP).
> 
> An example URI is "grpc+tcp://192.168.0.1:3337".
> 
> Please vote whether to accept the changes. The vote will be open for at
> least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Accept this change to the Flight protocol
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the changes because...
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Antoine.

Reply via email to