Hey all, We're having the TensorFlow SIG-Build meeting on 5th Feb 3pm PST (https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20190205T15&p1=224). Agenda is linked from: https://groups.google.com/a/tensorflow.org/forum/#!topic/build/akyPcGoBIy4
I'd like to invite everyone from this thread to join the call if at all possible. The agenda for this meeting will spend most of the time focusing on the manylinux issue and hopefully we can get together to flesh out a decent plan on how to tackle this. Thanks, Jason On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 23:34, 'Manuel Klimek' via SIG Build <bu...@tensorflow.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 4:21 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: >> >> >> Le 30/01/2019 à 16:09, Manuel Klimek a écrit : >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:51 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org >> > <mailto:anto...@python.org>> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Le 30/01/2019 à 15:35, Manuel Klimek a écrit : >> > > >> > > Am I reading you wrong, or are you actually proposing to >> > package another >> > > libstdc++ version as a Python wheel? >> > > >> > > >> > > That would be the idea. >> > > >> > > >> > > If so, are you going to claim that the given wheel is >> > > manylinux-compatible? >> > > >> > > >> > > That is my question :) Why wouldn't it be? (I'd link it against >> > > manylinux libc and other C-only system libs) >> > >> > The problem is when you are loading two modules that link against >> > different libstdc++ versions in the same process. Incidentally, it's >> > the problem which prompted this discussion. >> > >> > >> > Sure, I'm aware :) I think as long as the requirement that all libraries >> > that want to exchange runtime-ABI-compatible versions are compiled with >> > the same toolchain, we can provide a way to mangle the symbols >> > differently. >> >> Ah, I see... Indeed, mangling the symbols may work for this. >> >> That said, if you're looking to create a de facto standard, why can't it >> be proposed as a manylinux iteration? > > > I'd have thought because it doesn't change the system requirements, while > manylinux seems to be all about system requirements. > The idea is that that toolchain would still work on any manylinux compatible > machine. > > > >> >> >> Regards >> >> Antoine. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "SIG Build" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to build+unsubscr...@tensorflow.org. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/tensorflow.org/group/build/.
