hi folks,

I left some feedback on this PR. If others could take a look
(particularly at the .proto service definition) that would be useful.

We should decide on an approach to getting multiple production-worthy
Flight/RPC implementations ready to go. It would be a good goal to
deliver (end-to-end send/receive data between Python and Java, or
Python and other Python processes) in the next couple releases.

- Wes

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote:
> Correct, I'm maintaining standard protobuf encoding so a consumer that
> doesn't go byte by byte can still consumer/produce the messages.
>
> More impls: for sure.
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I see; looking more closely I see you've sidestepped the standard
>> Protobuf serialization to write the stream as tagged components:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/compare/master...jacques-n:flight#diff-
>> 02cfc9235e22653fce8a7636c9f95507R241
>>
>> and then reading the fields of the message tag by tag
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/compare/master...jacques-n:flight#diff-
>> 02cfc9235e22653fce8a7636c9f95507R159
>>
>> Would it be correct that if a GRPC implementation doesn't provide
>> sufficient access to the byte stream (or if it doesn't care enough
>> about zero copy) that you could allow GRPC to return an instance of
>> the FlightData structure?
>>
>> I expect we'd want to see a few interoperable implementations (I
>> suggest Java, C++, Go) to harden the fine details.
>>
>> - Wes
>>
>> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Cutting through the layers of GRPC will be a per language approach thing.
>> > Assuming that each GRPC language implementation does a good job of
>> > separating message encapsulation from the base library, this should be
>> > straight-forward-ish. Hope improves around this as I see creation of
>> > non-protobuf protocols built on top of the base GRPC [1]. How to do this
>> in
>> > each language will probably take time looking at the GRPC internals for
>> > that language but can be a secondary step once you get the protocol
>> working
>> > (you can just pay for extra copies until then).
>> >
>> > In my Java approach I believe I do one read copy and zero write copies
>> > (needs more testing) which was my target. (Getting to zero-copy on read
>> > means a lot more complexity because your socket-reading has to be
>> protocol
>> > aware: even our bespoke layer in Dremio doesn't try to do that. I'd guess
>> > KRPC does the same but haven't reviewed the code to confirm.)
>> >
>> > Will try to get some more slides/readme and a proper proposed patch up
>> soon.
>> >
>> > [1] https://grpc.io/blog/flatbuffers
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> hey Jacques,
>> >>
>> >> This is great news, I look forward to digging into this. My biggest
>> >> initial question is the Protobuf encapsulation, specifically:
>> >>
>> >> https://github.com/jacques-n/arrow/blob/flight/java/flight/
>> >> src/main/protobuf/flight.proto#L99
>> >>
>> >> My understanding of Protocol Buffers is that on read, the "data_body"
>> >> memory would be copied out of the serialized protobuf that came across
>> >> the wire. Your comment in the .proto says this "comes last in the
>> >> definition to help with sidecar patterns" -- my read is that it would
>> >> be up to us to do our own sidecar implementation, similar to how
>> >> Apache Kudu has zero-copy sidecars in their KRPC system [1] (the
>> >> comment there describes pretty much exactly the problem we have). I
>> >> saw that you also replied on a GRPC thread about this issue [2]. Could
>> >> you summarize what (if anything) stands in the way to get zero-copy on
>> >> write and read?
>> >>
>> >> - Wes
>> >>
>> >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/kudu/blob/master/src/kudu/rpc/
>> >> rpc_sidecar.h#L34
>> >> [2]: https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/issues/1054#issuecomment-
>> 391692087
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > FYI, if you want to see an example server you can run with a GRPC
>> >> generated
>> >> > client, you can run the ExampleFlightServer located at [1]. Very basic
>> >> > 'test' with that class and client is located at [2].
>> >> >
>> >> > [1]
>> >> > https://github.com/jacques-n/arrow/tree/flight/java/flight/
>> >> src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/flight/example
>> >> > [2]
>> >> > https://github.com/jacques-n/arrow/blob/flight/java/flight/
>> >> src/test/java/org/apache/arrow/flight/example/TestExampleServer.java
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hey All,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I used my Strata talk today as a forcing function to make additional
>> >> >> progress on a GRPC-based Arrow RPC protocol [1]. I’m calling it
>> “Apache
>> >> >> Arrow Flight”. You can take a look at the work here [2]. I’ll work to
>> >> clean
>> >> >> up my work and explain my thoughts about the protocol in the coming
>> >> days.
>> >> >> High-level: use protobuf as a encapsulation format so that any client
>> >> that
>> >> >> is supported in GRPC will work. However, we can optimize the
>> read/write
>> >> >> path for targeted languages and hand control the
>> >> >> serialization/deserialization and memory handling. (I did that in
>> this
>> >> Java
>> >> >> patch [3][4][5].) I also looked at starting to use GRPC generated
>> >> bindings
>> >> >> within Python but it looks like some glue code may be needed in the
>> C++
>> >> >> layer since Python delegates down frequently. I also am still trying
>> to
>> >> >> understand GRPC back-pressure patterns and whether the protocol
>> >> >> realistically needs to change to cover real-world high performance
>> use
>> >> >> cases.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I’ll send out some slides about the ideas and update README, etc.
>> soon.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Jacques
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [1] https://github.com/jacques-n/arrow/blob/flight/java/flight/
>> >> >> src/main/protobuf/flight.proto
>> >> >> [2] http://github.com/jacques-n/arrow/
>> >> >> [3] https://github.com/jacques-n/arrow/tree/flight/
>> >> >> java/flight/src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/flight/grpc
>> >> >> [4] https://github.com/jacques-n/arrow/blob/flight/
>> >> >> java/flight/src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/flight/
>> >> ArrowMessage.java#L253
>> >> >> <https://github.com/jacques-n/arrow/blob/flight/java/flight/
>> >> src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/flight/ArrowMessage.java#L253>
>> >> >> [5] https://github.com/jacques-n/arrow/blob/flight/
>> >> >> java/flight/src/main/java/org/apache/arrow/flight/
>> >> ArrowMessage.java#L185
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>

Reply via email to