Hi,

> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW
> 
> If any PMC members would like to be administrators of the space,
> please let me know your Confluence username. You have to create a
> separate account (it does not appear to be linked to JIRA accounts)

Can you add me? I've created "kou" account on Confluence.


Thanks,
--
kou

In <CAJPUwMAxYDUKKS9qLCqCbb1OJGnk2XJ-3fFS=nvm43ks40u...@mail.gmail.com>
  "Re: Housing longer-term Arrow development, design, and roadmap documents" on 
Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:27:50 -0400,
  Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:

> GitHub wiki pages lack collaboration features like commenting. It will
> be interesting to see what we can work up with JIRA integration, e.g.
> burndown charts for release management.
> 
> I asked INFRA to create a Confluence space for us so we can give it a
> try to see if it works for us. Confluence seems to have gotten a lot
> nicer since I last used it:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW
> 
> If any PMC members would like to be administrators of the space,
> please let me know your Confluence username. You have to create a
> separate account (it does not appear to be linked to JIRA accounts)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would prefer Confluence over GitHub pages because I would hope that one 
>> can integrate the ASF JIRA via widgets into the wiki pages. The vast amount 
>> of issues should all be categorizable into some topic. Once these are 
>> triaged, they should pop up in the respective wiki pages that could form a 
>> roadmap. That way, newcomers should get a better start to find the things to 
>> work on for a certain topic.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Uwe
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018, at 7:02 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Wes,
>>>
>>> I wonder if GitHub wiki pages would be an easier-to-approach alternative?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Antoine.
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 24/06/2018 à 08:42, Wes McKinney a écrit :
>>> > hi folks,
>>> >
>>> > Since the scope of Apache Arrow has grown significantly in the last
>>> > 2.5 years to encompass many programming languages and new areas of
>>> > functionality, I'd like to discuss how we could better accommodate
>>> > longer-term asynchronous discussions and stay organized about the
>>> > development roadmap.
>>> >
>>> > At any given time, there could be 10 or more initiatives ongoing, and
>>> > the number of concurrent initiatives is likely to continue increasing
>>> > over time as the community grows larger. Just off the top of my head
>>> > here's some stuff that's ongoing / up in the air:
>>> >
>>> > * Remaining columnar format design questions (interval types, unions, 
>>> > etc.)
>>> > * Arrow RPC client/server design (aka "Arrow Flight")
>>> > * Packaging / deployment / release management
>>> > * Rust language build out
>>> > * Go language build out
>>> > * Code generation / LLVM (Gandiva)
>>> > * ML/AI framework integration (e.g. with TensorFlow, PyTorch)
>>> > * Plasma roadmap
>>> > * Record data types (thread I just opened)
>>> >
>>> > With ~500 open issues on JIRA, I have found that newcomers feel a bit
>>> > overwhelmed when they're trying to find a part of the project to get
>>> > involved with. Eventually one must sink one's teeth into the JIRA
>>> > backlog, but I think it would be helpful to have some centralized
>>> > project organization and roadmap documents to help navigate all of the
>>> > efforts going on in the project.
>>> >
>>> > I don't think documents in the repository are a great solution for
>>> > this, as they don't facilitate discussions very easily --
>>> > documentation or Markdown documents (like the columnar format
>>> > specification) are good to write there when some decisions have been
>>> > made. Google Documents are great, but they are somewhat ephemeral.
>>> >
>>> > I would suggest using the ASF's Confluence wiki for these purposes.
>>> > The Confluence UI is a bit clunky like other Atlassian products, but
>>> > the wiki-style model (central landing page + links to subprojects) and
>>> > collaboration features (comments and discussions on pages) would give
>>> > us what we need. I suspect that it integrates with JIRA also, which
>>> > would help with cross-references to particular concrete JIRA items
>>> > related to subprojects. Here's an example of a Confluence landing page
>>> > for another ASF project:
>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Impala
>>> >
>>> > What do others think?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Wes
>>> >

Reply via email to