I would be happy to do that time but on Wednesday. So 20th September at 16:00 for the next sync (if we run into a conflict with the Parquet sync we can skip a week). I can set up a calendar invite and add all interested parties.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Kevin Moore <ke...@quiltdata.io> wrote: > Wednesday is better than Thursday for me too (though you should optimize > for more active members than me). > > ---- > Kevin Moore > CEO, Quilt Data, Inc. > ke...@quiltdata.io | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinemoore/> > (415) 497-7895 > > > Manage Data like Code > quiltdata.com > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Generally yes. However, Unfortunately Thursday's at 16:00 are bad for me. >> Maybe we do when Parquet does but offset weeks? >> >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > The sync call today was at 16:00 UTC which which is an hour that works >> > decently well for developers in North/South America and Europe, but >> > it's a bit late for Asia (12am in Shanghai, 1am in Tokyo). >> > >> > It would be good to have a standing biweekly meeting. I would suggest >> > we try the 16:00 time and if we have more developers joining from Asia >> > that we consider going to 15:00 (which is 7am in California for part >> > of the year, so a bit early but still doable). Does that work for >> > everyone? >> > >> > What day of the week is best for everyone? Parquet has been having >> > sync calls on Wednesdays. We could do Thursdays every 2 weeks? >> > >> > By this logic the next sync would be 21 September at 16:00. My >> > schedule is flexible so if there is a better day or time let me know. >> > >> > - Wes >> > >>
