Updates on the integration between C++/JAVA:

*Decimal:*
Thanks to Phillip Cloud and Bryan Cutler. We have a compatible C++
implementation and Java Json reader for Decimal. The last bit is just to
add Decimal in the integration suite.

*Union:*
There is a open PR that needs someone more experienced on the Java side to
take a look:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/987

*FixedSizeBinary:*
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1012
Thanks to Jingyuan Wang for the PR.
I've reviewed and gave some feedback. It would be very helpful if someone
more experienced on the Java side can take a look too.

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:

> dear all,
>
> We've made good progress on the 0.7.0 release. There's still a little
> over 40 issues left in the release milestone
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341141
>
> Any help (especially on investigating bugs) would be appreciated.
> There are many patches in code review -- any assistance with reviewing
> (especially from Java developers / users) would also be great.
>
> I'll be working on burning down as many of these as I can and we can
> discuss where we stand in the sync call on Thursday at 16:00 UTC (will
> send out Hangout link to the mailing list).
>
> Thanks,
> Wes
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm currently working on adding support for inserting Arrow records into
> > Databases with turbodbc via OBDC. I've already discovered a small bug
> > (PR is already sent) in Arrow. But as I touch a bit of code that was not
> > used much outside of Arrow/Parquet, I'd prefer to have the
> > implementation in turbodbc in Review before we start the 0.7.0 release
> > process. This will either happen today or latest on Tuesday. Just a
> > small-heads up so that we have all it needs for this in the next Arrow
> > release.
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> >> hi folks,
> >>
> >> There are a number of Java-related patches in flight that are going to
> >> need some TLC from folks with deeper experience using the affected
> >> code in downstream projects:
> >>
> >> Union changes + integration tests:
> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/987
> >> Decimal type improvements + integration test support:
> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/994
> >> Fixed size binary + integration tests:
> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1012
> >>
> >> It would be really super to get 3 more logical types fully integration
> >> tested against C++ in 0.7.0. This additionally would allow Spark to
> >> send Decimal data to Python via C++.
> >>
> >> Getting these done would get us closer to complete integration
> >> coverage. Still some things left to do (intervals, fixed size lists).
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Wes
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > hello again,
> >> >
> >> > There is still a lot of work to do for 0.7.0. There are another ~60
> >> > JIRAs marked for the 0.7.0 release -- I don't think these will all get
> >> > done, but we should stretch to do as many as possible. I think we may
> >> > be able to complete Java/C++ integration tests for (sparse) unions and
> >> > decimals, which would be nice progress toward format stability.
> >> >
> >> > Please contribute whatever you can -- the target time frame (assuming
> >> > serious blockers do not arise) for a release candidate is the end of
> >> > next week.
> >> >
> >> > - Wes
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >> I would like to push for a 0.7.0 release candidate roughly 2 weeks
> for
> >> >> now, so shortly after the US Labor Day holiday.
> >> >>
> >> >> The release page on JIRA is here:
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341141
> >> >>
> >> >> I have not very carefully curated these JIRAs, so I will make a pass
> >> >> through when I can and remove anything in my purview (C++ and Python)
> >> >> that does not seem like a "must do" or "stretch goal" for the
> release.
> >> >> If there is any work you would like to see go into the next release,
> >> >> can you update JIRA accordingly (adding a Fix Version or creating new
> >> >> issues)?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks!
> >> >> Wes
>

Reply via email to