I'm looking through them On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi all, > > I'm working to close out the remaining Python and C++ stuff we wanted > to get in to 0.3 for the sake of other Python projects that want to > use Arrow. > > There are 8 patches up that touch the Java codebase. If we can get all > these closed out then I think we should be able to cut a release > candidate sometime next week. > > Thanks > Wes > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > With the Easter holiday and long weekend, we probably will not be able > > to do an RC until next week at earliest. > > > > In the meantime, there are a lot of patches in review. Please keep the > > release JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-670) updated > > with blocking issues so we can track what patches are in progress or > > still TODO. > > > > Thanks! > > Wes > > > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Julien Le Dem <jul...@dremio.com> > wrote: > >> The current 0.3 goal is good for me. > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> hi folks, > >>> > >>> We've been making excellent progress toward the 0.3 release -- 123 > >>> patches in since 0.2, which was released a little over 6 weeks ago. > >>> > >>> Here is the JIRA to help track related issues: > >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-670 > >>> > >>> Once ARROW-510 (https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/475, thanks > >>> Leif!) has been resolved, we'll have all of the date and time types > >>> reconciled which was one of the major goals for the release. It would > >>> be nice to get the fixed size binary working end to end (ARROW-634), > >>> but if that slips to 0.4, I don't think it's a big deal. > >>> > >>> I know there are a number of other Java patches in flight; I will let > >>> others comment on their status. > >>> > >>> What remains on the C++ and Python side > >>> > >>> * Decimal patch (ARROW-655) > >>> * Some date and time compatibility with pandas > >>> * Packaging issues on Linux / OS X, e.g. wheels for pyarrow that can > >>> be compiled against / linked to by thirdparties > >>> * Windows support for Python > >>> * Some miscellanea parquet-cpp integration improvements > >>> > >>> If all goes well, we may be able to cut an RC next week or the week > after. > >>> > >>> Is there anything else that others would like to see go into the 0.3 > >>> release? I think we may be able to make the 0.4 release more quickly > >>> (~1 month or less after 0.3) as we finish out some of the additional > >>> compatibility issues (dictionaries in IPC stream/file format is a > >>> significant one). > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> Wes > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Julien > -- Julien
