Hi,
I very much agree to provide the Admin API SDK, but I see that you
only mentioned the Java language. In fact, I think if we can provide an
OpenAPI (Swagger) [1] specification file, we can generate normal API
documents and multi language SDKs with the help of OpenAPI generator
tool [2].
What do you think?
[1] OpenAPI Specification <https://swagger.io/resources/open-api/>
[2] OpenAPITools/openapi-generator
<https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator>
孙昊 <[email protected]> 于2021年9月25日周六 下午6:45写道：
> Hi:
> If your team thinks my suggestion is reasonable, I am very happy to
> assist you in this matter. I have used Java as the main development
> language for 10 years.
> About the "mustake":
> 1. When I want to use an API, I have to go to the official website of
> apisix to find documentation. If we have a perfect javadoc, we can solve
> this problem greatly.
> 2. It may be due to carelessness, wrong parameter names and wrong
> types. This will cause a lot of trouble. But Java is strongly typed, and
> this type of problem can be avoided.
>
> Zhiyuan Ju <[email protected]> 于2021年9月25日周六 下午6:37写道：
>
> > Good suggestion! Does anyone else also like this kind of SDK? If so,
> would
> > you like to take this project?
> >
> > BTW, may I know the details information about “mustake” you mean?
> >
> > 孙昊 <[email protected]>于2021年9月25日 周六下午6:27写道：
> >
> > > Hello, everyone:
> > > Our company now uses apisix as our api gateway, and our main
> > > development languages are Java and JavaScript.
> > > In the process of using apisix, we often use the admin api of
> apisix.
> > > We need to create and initiate requests repeatedly, which is very
> > > cumbersome, and sometimes, the parameter names, parameter types, etc.
> are
> > > mistaken. So, I suggest that the apisix team can release an SDK toolkit
> > for
> > > Java, Types can be defined inside, because Java is strongly typed.
> > > Good luck to everyone!
> > >
> > --
> > 来自 琚致远
> >
>
