Thanks for the reminder, Matt. So we could stay on ASF infrastructure. https://selfserve.apache.org/ but for git repos https://gitbox.apache.org/
Both forms require PMC-name, repo-name, repo-description, commit-notification-list and github-notification list. But while (for me) the selfserve-form seems to be fully functional, the gitbox-form had no entries for the PMC listbox. Jan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Matt Sicker [mailto:boa...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Februar 2018 19:50 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re: Future of SVN repos > > Creating new git repos on apache is self-serve, so it's just as easy as > GitHub really (though you need to be a PMC member I think). > > On 28 February 2018 at 12:48, Jan Matèrne (jhm) <apa...@materne.de> > wrote: > > > > > If we want to migrate the site repo, we should also think about > > > > handling the sandbox. > > > > > > I think we just never migrated it because it simply wasn't used. > > > Using a single git repository for several unrelated experiments > > > doesn't sound very git-like. > > > > Yep. > > We could migrate site to git and then close all svn repos (make them > > read-only). > > If required someone could create a local git repo for new "sandbox > > experiments". Shareable via github and later moving to ASF > > infrastructure if it changes to be more than an experiment. > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional > > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
