Exactly what I had in mind 👍

Gintas

2017-07-17 22:32 GMT+02:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) <apa...@materne.de>:

> Maybe you could set the timeout strategy globally:
> /ivysettings/resolvers/@timeout-constraint
>
> <ivysettings>
>    <timeout-contraints>
>       <timeout-constraint name="smaller-timeout" connection-timeout=""
> read-timeout="" />
>       ...
>    </timeout-constraints>
>
>    <resolvers timeout-constraint="global-timeout">
>       <ibiblio timeout-constraint="smaller-timeout" ... />
>    </resolvers>
> </ivysettings>
>
>
> Jan
>
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: jai.forums2...@gmail.com [mailto:jai.forums2...@gmail.com]
> > Gesendet: Montag, 17. Juli 2017 06:56
> > An: dev@ant.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Proposed changes for IVY-735 - Ability to specify timeouts
> >
> > I think, that's actually a good idea. Defining the timeout constraints
> > separately as named constraints and then referencing them would allow
> > reusing these values on whichever resolvers want to:
> >
> > <ivysettings>
> >
> >   <timeout-contraints>
> >
> >      <timeout-constraint name="smaller-timeout" connection-timeout=""
> > read-timeout="">
> >
> >      ...
> >
> >   </timeout-constraints>
> >
> >   <resolvers>
> >
> >      <ibiblio timeout-constraint="smaller-timeout" .../>
> >
> >   </resolvers>
> >
> > </ivysettings>
> >
> >
> > -Jaikiran
> >
> >
> > On 14/07/17 10:33 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> > > my €.02 : currently, all resolvers only have artifact patterns as
> > > child elements, so I'd rather have the timeouts as attributes that
> > > might use references, similarly to cache managers or latest
> > > strategies. That would imply a global default that may be overridden
> > individually.
> > >
> > > Gintas
> > >
> > > 2017-07-14 13:34 GMT+02:00 <jaikiran....@cloudfabrix.com>:
> > >
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-735 is a feature request
> > >> where the users have asked for relevant timeouts while dealing with
> > >> downloads. A few weeks back we had a very brief discussion in an
> > >> unrelated mail where it was proposed that we allow configuring these
> > >> timeout all the way from ivy settings.
> > >>
> > >> I have an initial proposal/attempt to implement this feature. The
> > >> initial changes are here in my personal repo[1]. It's a work in
> > >> progress commit which sets up the necessary interfaces and the flow
> > >> to show what I have in mind. Before proceeding further, I would like
> > >> some inputs on whether this looks fine. Here's a summary of what the
> > changes are going to be:
> > >>
> > >> - Each (dependency) resolver will have the ability to specify
> > >> "timeout constraints"[2].
> > >>
> > >> - These timeout constraints will be specified while defining the
> > >> resolver in the ivy settings file. Imagine something like:
> > >>
> > >>      <ivysettings>
> > >>
> > >>          <resolvers>
> > >>
> > >>              <ibiblio ...>
> > >>
> > >>                  <timeout-constraints connection-timeout=""
> > >> read-timeout=""/>
> > >>
> > >>              </ibiblio>
> > >>
> > >>      ....
> > >>
> > >> - Each of the resolver will then use these timeout constraints (if
> > >> specified) while resolving the module descriptor and downloading the
> > >> artifacts and dealing with those resources.
> > >>
> > >> - The absence of the timeout constraints will let the resolvers
> > >> behave the way they do currently
> > >>
> > >> The changes in the linked commit deprecate some APIs which weren't
> > >> using timeouts and are replaced by APIs which pass along (an
> > >> optional) TimeoutConstraints[2].
> > >>
> > >> In summary, the change being proposed is that (dependency) resolvers
> > >> have the ability to specify these timeout constraints and then use
> > >> them while dealing with module descriptors and artifacts. One thing
> > I
> > >> have (to some extent intentionally) left out is the ability to
> > define
> > >> a global Ivy settings level or "all resolvers" level
> > >> timeout-constraints. That's because I'm not too sure if it adds much
> > >> value instead of defining it at individual resolver level. I'm
> > however open to adding that support as well.
> > >>
> > >> The linked commit currently doesn't have the necessary support for
> > >> parsing these additional XML elements, but if this whole approach
> > >> looks fine, I will take this further and make sure things work as
> > expected.
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://github.com/jaikiran/ant-ivy/commit/e501d9deca78db8b9
> > >> 34f8a2710ebcfeaeb1456c8
> > >>
> > >> [2] https://github.com/jaikiran/ant-ivy/commit/e501d9deca78db8b9
> > >> 34f8a2710ebcfeaeb1456c8#diff-cd8ed454a52f4afa779574f5600a0ccb
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -Jaikiran
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For
> > additional
> > >> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional
> > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to