I think that upgrading the requirement on the JDK is a good idea, because at least us, the maintainers, need at some point to be able to test it if there is an issue with that minimum JDK.
One thing to consider is which JDK is being required in the environment Ivy is being used: Ant, Gradle, SBT, Eclipse, Intellij… We shouldn’t require too high. Nicolas > Le 18 mai 2017 à 10:58, J Pai <jai.forums2...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be fine if we > mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something higher than Java 5 > that’s currently supported for 2.4.x > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/compatibility.html. > > Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether we should > consider that as minimum supported version or something higher. Any thoughts? > > Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize on the > Java version. > > -Jaikiran > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
