Hello Jesse,
in fact the patch is failing one test :
testTestMethods in junit-test.xml
The test bad in T2.java runs [or at least something is reported as failing ]
although only "ok" is included.
Regards,
Antoine
<echo file="${input}/T1.java">public class T1 extends
junit.framework.TestCase {
public void testOK() {}
public void testBad() {throw new
RuntimeException("failed");}
}</echo>
<echo file="${input}/T2.java">
import org.junit.Test;
public class T2 {
@Test
public void ok() {}
@Test
public void bad() {
throw new RuntimeException("failed");}
}</echo>
<javac srcdir="${input}" destdir="${output}" includes="T1.java,T2.java"
source="5" includeantruntime="false">
<classpath>
<path refid="junit" />
</classpath>
</javac>
<junit fork="true" printsummary="true" haltonerror="true">
<classpath>
<pathelement location="${output}" />
<path refid="junit" />
</classpath>
<test name="T1" methods="testOK" />
<test name="T2" methods="ok" />
</junit>
</target>
Regards,
Antoine
On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> -0. My main reservation is that an important patch, JUnit @Ignore support
> [1], is outstanding. (I promised Michael Clarke it would get reviewed.) It
> could be pushed back to 1.9.1 of course, but that could be a long way off.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43969
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
