On 12/20/10 11:10 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-12-20, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Because of the fact that a single -1 makes the vote result negative,
I haven't counted the votes but still want to point out that releases
are majority votes and can't be vetoed. Since I voted non-+1 on an
IvyDE release a while back it has become important to me that people
know this is not a veto.
Oooh. I did not re-read the bylaws. You are right of course.
I am going this morning to rollback the version number changes which I
had done in trunk [2], make a new build with the change concerning the
JUnit task [1], and start a second vote thread.
Since you've called for the vote you can always cancel and re-run it if
you deem it necessary, of course.
Since I have already rebuilt a new release candidate, I am going to
cancel and re-run the vote.
Jesse will certainly know best whether the fix you've applied re-enables
the feature that seems to be broken (haven't checked).
Stefan
Regards,
Antoine
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
