Having FAQ, externals and projects in that distro would be fine, but I could also live with just the manual and the rest online.
Jan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org] > Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Juli 2010 15:45 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re: Distributing Docs: Manual or whole Site? > > On Wednesday 14 July 2010 17:11:25 Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've just modified build.xml to create additional > > a...@version@-manual.[zip|tar.(gz|bz2)] files containing just the > manual > > portion of the docs - including javadocs. > > > > As I already offered, I'm going to create such artifacts from the > past > > five binary releases and call for a vote to release them (four of > them > > will go to the archive mirror more or less immediately). > > > > Before I do so I wanted to double check that my decision to just > bundle > > up the manual is a good one or whether it would be better to > distribute > > the whole docs directory which also contains the website. > > Packaging just the manual seems fine for me. Apart the FAQ I see no > information what would need to be archived or seen offline. > > Then maybe the faq should be included in the manual ? > > Nicolas > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
