How about:

<target-inteface name="foo"/>
<target name="bar" implements="foo"/>

/me run and hides!

2009/12/12 Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org>

> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:51:30 -0600, Dominique Devienne
> <ddevie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Xavier Hanin <xavier.ha...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> 2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>
> >>> and would do away with any notion of target composition people way
> >>> expect from the name target-*group*.
> >> I also think the name target-group is confusing for something that
> >> doesn't
> >> provide any composition. [...] What do you think this:
> >> <target name="foo" dependencies="open"/>
> >> <target name="bar" join-depends="foo"/>
> >
> > Like in a SQL join you mean? ;)
> >
> >> But I'm not good at finding names, so maybe I should just go back to my
> >> work :-)
> >
> > Frankly I think the Maven terminology of a "goal" is appropriate here.
> > The fact that a goal is implemented as a target that has no tasks is
> > an impl detail. I think it easier that a goal is a higher level
> > abstraction that the target, and that target can choose to participate
> > into one and only one goal. Whether goals themselves should only
> > depend on goals might be a good idea. Goals would define the "abstract
> > interface" to the build system and logic, and targets become its
> > implementation. As I wrote, a target can belong to only a single goal,
> > but can depend on targets or goals, as long as the DAG is acyclic.
>
> I think that "abstract interface" target and "implementation" target seems
> to fit very well into my use case I presented earlier. It was about a build
> script expecting some target implementation to be run before some other;
> expecting "build-jar", "build-flex" to be run before "ivy-install". And
> then the abstract target is "dist".
>
> Then about the term "goal", I don't find it self explaining, but if in
> Maven there is the same exact notion, I am good with not spreading new
> terms for the same ideas. On the other hand if there would be non trivial
> difference, we shouldn't choose "goal". I cannot say thought, I don't know
> Maven enought.
>
> Nicolas
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Jean Louis Boudart
Independent consultant
Project Lead http://www.easyant.org

Reply via email to