On 2009-02-13, Jesse Glick <jesse.gl...@sun.com> wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>>> if (!f.getName().equals("package-info.java")) {
>>>> continue;
>> should that test better be case-insensitive?
> Should it? I don't know.
The rest of javac's uptodate checks is case-sensitive, so we may
better leave it that way. Sorry for the confusion.
> To Dominique - yes this should be the equivalent of compiling a
> package-info.java containing only SOURCE annotations using JDK 5.
Do you know whether a Java 1.4 VM will even try to load the class
file under any circumstances (other than some explicit reflection
invocations)?
> It would be good to get feedback on whether this trick works for the
> cases users have brought up and introduces no problems.
At the risk of sounding strange: don't the descriptions in bugzilla
provide enough information to write AntUnit tests?
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
