I've given in and used my googlemail account for the easyant group,
grmbl.
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Jean-Louis BOUDART <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll look through the patch and will comment/start new threads for
them later (maybe more than just a bit later).
Since you are using Ant's trunk anyway, if we decide to add parts of
the patch or a similar patch to achieve the same, you could modifiy
your patch and required baseline of ant, right?
> - introduce "phase" concept : A kind of target that contains
> *ONLY*dependencies,
I'm not good at names. I understand why this is a good name in the
context of EasyAnt but struggle with the same name when applied to
"pure" Ant.
I recall being confused by the phase mapping when Xavier first
suggested it.
> - introduce two different kind of import (what we call use /
> extends)
I think you will quickly find support for this separation here, in
particular if we throw in user definded prefixes where the writer of
the build file that uses another build file gets to define the prefix
of targets - hi, DD ;-)
> - modify project-help to display phases separated from targets
If the concept of a phase is different from that of a "plain" target,
then it deserve its own logging, agreed.
Cheers
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
