>> > I think it would be better to write
>> > Message.info("\n\nIVYDE: Ivy-settings has changed,
configuring Ivy again\n");
>> > Or is "ivysettings" a technical term?
>>
>> well, in Ivy's literature, I used to read about some "ivyconf", so
with the
>> new terminology, it becames "ivysettings". It looks understandable
for me.
>> But I don't have any objection to change every occurence of it into
"Ivy
>> settings".
>
>To me ivysettings is pretty obvious, at least when you know
>how Ivy settings
>are written. But Ivy settings would be fine too, I don't mind.
I am not so familiar with Ivy (yet). So if "ivysettings" is a common
technical term,
I would keep it as it is.
Thanks for clarification.
Jan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
