On 16/04/2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  > Maven has naming conventions [1], [2].
>  >
>  > The problem is that those conventions apeared  with maven 2.  maven 1
>  > didn't had this and the maven repository actully contains an export of
>  > the maven 1 repository.  That's why the naming convention didn't
>  > seemed to be always followed.
>  >
>  > Note however, that they give advices to fix that [3].
>
>
> The problem is that the repository is cluttered with old naming conventions,
>  which make it sometimes difficult for users to find their way out:
>  http://javarepo.xoocode.org/search?q=%23hibernate%3B
>  http://javarepo.xoocode.org/search?q=%23commons-email%3B
>  http://javarepo.xoocode.org/search?q=%23commons-transaction%3B
>  http://javarepo.xoocode.org/search?q=%23commons-collections%3B
>

I agree, but in some case there are hints that one has replaced the other.
If you look for instance at the latest version of
commons-email:commons-email (version 1.1), it say that it has been
relocated.  That may be an information that could be exploited.

-- 
Gilles Scokart

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to