Hi Steve,

actually I want 2 getter and 2 setter methods. Please review the 
applied patch I supply and say if everything is OK. 

Thanks, Petar.
http://www.nabble.com/file/p15434717/JUnitTask_getters_setters.patch
JUnitTask_getters_setters.patch 

Steve Loughran wrote:
> 
> Petar Tahchiev wrote:
>> Sorry for the formating :-(.
>> 
>> 
>> Hi guys,
>> 
>> it's Petar Tahchiev from the Jakarta Cactus Team (again :-)).
>> I am trying to integrate the CactusTask with Ant 1.8-alpha.
>> The CactusTask does:
>> 0) Extends the JUnitTask from Ant.
>> 1) Gets all the tests from JUnitTask
>> 2) Iterates over them and sets different properties to each one of them.
>> 3) Calls the JUnitTask to executes the test-cases.
>> 
>> So, the basis is that we are no longer able to use
>> 
>> execute(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTest);
>> 
>> because the delegate field (Object of type JUnitTaskMirror) leaves
>> uninitialized and thus the CactusTask throws NLPE.
>> This way to execute the tests we are bound to use the execute() method of
>> the
>> JUnitTask (because in that method the delegate object gets initialized).
>> When calling
>> the execute() method we have to have our tests configured. But when I get
>> the tests and configure them with:
>> ===============================================================
>>                 Enumeration tests = getIndividualTests();
>>                
>>                 while (tests.hasMoreElements())
>>                 {
>>                     JUnitTest test = (JUnitTest) tests.nextElement();
>>                    
>>                     if (test.shouldRun(getProject())
>>                      && !theWrapper.isExcluded(test.getName()))
>>                     {
>>                         test.setFork(true);
>>                         if (theWrapper.getToDir() != null)
>>                         {
>>                             test.setTodir(theWrapper.getToDir());
>>                         }
>> ===============================================================
>> 
>> I am no longer able to set them in the JUnitTask. The field tests is
>> private:
>> 
>>     private Vector tests = new Vector();
>> 
>> and there is no setter for an individual test, or a vector of tests.
>> 
>> Please, can you look serious to this and supply a setter method for this.
>> This way I can configure
>> the tests and set them in the JUnitTask, and after that just call
>> execute().
>> 
> 
> So all you want is a setTests(Vector) method? or an addTest(JUnitTest) 
> method that adds a new test?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Steve Loughran                  http://www.1060.org/blogxter/publish/5
> Author: Ant in Action           http://antbook.org/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Cactus-1.8---Ant-1.8-Integration-tp15396771p15434717.html
Sent from the Ant - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to