On Jan 15, 2008 12:51 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> 2. What is the minimum version of Ant that 1.8 is targeting? > > >> I'm not sure whether we've made any decision to change what we have > as > > >> a minimum requirement for 1.7. > > > > > > we dropped 1.2, so it is 1.3 > > > http://marc.info/?l=ant-dev&m=117794737813795&w=2 > > > > > > > OK. > > > > Ant 1.3 is still out there. It would be nice to move up to 1.4 for the > > > 1.8 codebase, at least for some things. I wonder how much use of 1.3 > is > > out there? > > I think there was already a try to start a vote of dropping Java 1.3 as > it > should be at end of life.
I do not think we should do this. As far as I know, there is no super compelling reason to make ant only work on java 1.4 +, java5, on the other hand.... Peter > But if I remember right without any success. > > What is the newest JDK version on our supported platforms? > > > Jan > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
