well, backward compatibility requires to keep the current  Resolver
behaviour, overwrite = false make your build stop if a file already exists.
So the API need to change to allow user to tell that he want
synchronization. I feel like this is going to break a lot of code, is it
usefull ? 

Before really coding , I would like to be confident that this feature is
really helpful , 

Do you share your integration repository and production ? 


Xavier Hanin wrote:
> 
> On Jan 10, 2008 12:41 AM, kermitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>
>> I attached my previous post from user mailling. I take a moment tonight
>> to
>> figure out the error.
>>
>> In my mind, I wanted to synchronize two repositories which is not
>> possible
>> regarding the code. As if overwrite is set to false an IOException is
>> thrown
>> as soon as an existing artifact is found.
>>
>> I feel like synchronization would be a good feature, what do you think
>> of?
>>
>> There is different way to handle the feature but it would requires API
>> change somehow. We need distingate the case of an exception of Input
>> Output
>> and the "file already exist" case.
>>
>> Some suggestions:
>>
>> void publish(Artifact artifact, File src, boolean overwrite) throws
>> IOException, ExistingArtifactUncheckedException;
>>
>> => Would unify error message regarding duplicate as IOException is filled
>> with various message according the resolver.
>>
>> void publish(Artifact artifact, File src, boolean overwrite,boolean
>> skipExistingFile) throws IOException;
> 
> 
> If we make ExistingArtifactException extends IOException we keep the same
> API and we still have finer grain information as you want.
> 
> Feel free to open an issue, and maybe attach a patch since you seem to
> already have a pretty clear idea of what you want (don't forget unit test
> to
> increase chance to get included).
> 
> Xavier
> 
>>
>>
>> ....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Trace confuse me a bit , I am using SFTP and I would suggest to add to
>> SFTPRepository.java line 137:
>>            if (!overwrite && checkExistence(destination, c)) {
>>                throw new IOException("destination file " + destination +
>> "
>> exists and overwrite == true");
>>            }
>>
>> regards,
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have two repo : local , integration
>>
>> I tried to use ivy:install to migrate my modules between them.
>>
>> After publishing in local, i start a new task to migrate new dependencies
>> I
>> could have added to my local repo during my developpement:
>>
>> <ivy:install organisation="${ivy.organisation}" module="${ivy.module}"
>> revision="${ivy.revision}" from="local" to="integration"
>> transitive="true"
>> />
>>
>>
>> [ivy:install] :: installing com.foo.test#Basic;1.53 ::
>> [ivy:install] :: resolving dependencies ::
>> [ivy:install]   found com.foo.test#Basic;1.53 in fs-local
>> [ivy:install]   found foo#AntCommon;1.39D in remote-private
>> [ivy:install]   found junit#junit;3.8.1 in remote-private
>> [ivy:install] :: downloading artifacts to cache ::
>> [ivy:install] downloading
>> d:\javadev\local-repository\com.foo.test\Basic\jars\Basic-1.53.jar ...
>> [ivy:install] .. (1kB)
>> [ivy:install] .. (0kB)
>> [ivy:install]   [SUCCESSFUL ] com.foo.test#Basic;1.53!Basic.jar (20ms)
>> [ivy:install] :: installing in remote ::
>> [ivy:install]   published Basic to
>> ./repository/private/com.foo.test/Basic/jars/Basic-1.53.jar
>> [ivy:install]   published ivy to
>> ./repository/private/com.foo.test/Basic/ivy-1.53.xml
>> [ivy:install] missing artifact foo#AntCommon;1.39D!AntCommon.zip:
>> [ivy:install]
>> d:\javadev\repository\.ivy-cache\foo\AntCommon\zips\AntCommon-1.39D.zipfile
>> does not exist
>>
>> BUILD FAILED
>> C:\javadev\src\AntCommon\src\build-common.xml:321: impossible to install
>> com.foo.test#Basic;1.53: java.io.IOException: destination file exists and
>> overwrite == true
>>
>> Total time: 1 minute 1 second
>>
>>
>>
>> I tried with ivy 1.4.1 and ivy 2.0 beta 1 same error, if I put transitive
>> to
>> false I don't get this error. I guess there is an issue with the artifact
>> being reprocessed one more time when transitive.
>> I don't really want to put overwrite="true" because I have so many
>> artifact
>> it would take too long ...
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/ivy%3Ainstall-tp14724560p14724560.html
>> Sent from the Ant - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
> http://xhab.blogspot.com/
> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
> http://www.xoocode.org/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/ivy%3Ainstall-tp14724560p14741900.html
Sent from the Ant - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to