On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, one solution is to keep it like that. Use three mailing list: > - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (for user list) > - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (for human dev related discussion) > - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (for commit, jira and gump generated > mails)
that would be the easiest from an infrastructure point of view. The list could be renamed, existing subscribers would be transferred automatically and the old addresses would forward for some time. > However, one of the drawback of this aproach is that we might often > have to put dev@ant.apache.org and [EMAIL PROTECTED] in copy of > our mails. True. This might call for a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, but right now I don't think it will be needed that often. Dominique's suggestion would solve that easily, of course. > I think the choice also depends on how will be made the votes for > release, for new committers, or for other subjects. Release votes would be on the dev list of the subproject that wants to do the release, whichever that may be. Votes on people are not really conducted on public lists anyway, it just looks as if they were. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
