Gilles Scokart wrote:
I know I might comes a little bit late with my question.
I have no problem to have all ant committers becoming ivy commiter.
Certainly not. It is a quick way to increase the size of the ivy community.
But I suddently have a doubt on what will happen if someone demonstrates his
trustability to the ivy community but is not present in the ant community?
How will be the vote for a new committer being made in that context?
I guess you make them a committer in ivy; they get access to both.
-there's almost no security risk in ant changes; its hard for anyone to
deliberately stick a back door in, the way you could with Xerces or Axis.
-biggest risk is just making backwards-incompatible changes to classes
and tasks.
-All commits on ant get looked by other people; its pretty hard to get
away with something drastic except in a commit so big the mailer doesn't
send it to the group (>100K of change). We'd ask some hard questions if
a change that big went in, as it is incredibly rare.
steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
