DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28882>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28882 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-11 03:39 ------- What do people think of me adding basic if/unless tests to <sequential>. Effort is low, testing simple and you can always use a previous <condition> to make a sequence out of it. Pro: easy to use Con: -suddenly, anyone that embeds a sequential inside their own code can get components that don't execute if their if/unless statements evaluate wrong -anyone that has subclassed Sequential has extra attributes/state to deal with. I'm about to subclass sequential at work for my own conditional bits (I want to make reporting/failure in our FunctionalTestTask optional, so that we can do an aggregate build with reporting/failure at the end) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
