DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43235>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43235 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-30 22:58 ------- Remark to comment #7 The only drawback is that this would prohibit using touch with mapper to do the most normal task for touch (to update to time=now) Alternative suggestion: Instead of a new attribute we could invent a new value for "datetime" the value "now" Touch used without mapper -> behaviour unchanged touch with mapper timestamp not specifeid -> inherrit time (as today) touch with mapper and timestamp specified -> use the time specified touch with mapper and timestamp specified as "now" -> set time to curent time We could keep the current behaviour of timestamp transfering if no -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
