DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43114>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43114 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-13 16:16 ------- Ah, that does complicate things. Actually, in my tests, any annotation on the package (even SOURCE retention) causes a package-info.class to be generated. Perhaps the following behavior would work, on the assumption that compiling _only_ a package-info.java is useless: collect two lists, outOfDate and piOutOfDate. For any regular *.java which is either missing its *.class or whose *.class is newer, add to outOfDate. For any package-info.java which is missing package-info.class, add to piOutOfDate. For any package-info.java which has a present but newer package-info.class, add to outOfDate. Now, if outOfDate is nonempty, run javac on outOfDate + piOutOfDate. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
