probably won't help you directly, but if you want to see some more antunit examples in real situations, I recently generated an antunit test suite for the eXist XMLDB project (exist.sourceforge.net)
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=317691&aid=1743796&group_id=17691 eXist XMLDB has a bunch of Ant tasks...so its not functional testing like you are discussing. note I found that antunit is more 'functional' then pure unit testing...which is probably what u are hinting at. gl, Jim Fuller On 7/31/07, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Chris Connelly > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I apologize in advance if this is the wrong forum for this question. > > This is the best forum available. > > > My questions: the AntUnit home page says: "AntUnit could also be > > used for functional and integration tests outside of the scope of > > Ant tasks ... This is an area that will need more research." > > When I wrote this sentence, I was toying with some ideas myself but > got distracted by other things that took a higher priority. > > Also I know of a company who was developing a testing toolkit > (eventually to become open sourced) where AntUnit might play a role > (but they seem to require Ant 1.6.x support). I can't and won't say > more, but I know some of their developers are reading this list. > > > Is anyone currently looking into this, and is this still considered > > a reasonable use of AntUnit? > > AFAIK nobody is actively researching this, but yes, it is a very > reasonable use of AntUnit. > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
