Dominique Devienne wrote:
On 5/18/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK. You've done what I've done, except with some stacking.
I had too, some of my builds had 3 or 4 levels, Makefile-style. Which
is not that surprising, since it was building mostly native stuff with
<ac:cc>. I think it's essential to do the stacking.
Someone remarked at the time it wasn't safe in the face of <parallel>,
but this wasn't a pb for me. --DD
yes, I saw that when I looked at it. Now, if we defined one of two
things we could address this
1. have a ProjectInfo class that includes (name,location URI,resource
ref,basedir) of a build file. Attach one to every project, give child
project's info about their parent
2. have every Project retain a ref to its parent.
#2 worries me from a memory perspective; as long as each child project
has a lifespan shorter than its parent all is well. Some embedded uses
could maybe do bad things. Also it lets people write tasks that
manipulate their parent and grandparent's state.
-steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
