--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The AntUnit documentation says: > > > > "Each test target is run in a fresh Ant project; > i.e. > > each test target has a fresh set of properties and > > references." > > I think it should better be the way the > documentation says, even > though it is currently implemented in a different > way (because it was > easier to do and I didn't think about it). >
I'm not going to fight on this one; obviously there are simple and valid reasons to use a new Project instance. You mention that properties, etc. are low-cost enough for setup; obviously so. My concern was actually for compilation of support classes (e.g. testing <java>); I would hate to keep compiling and blowing away a bunch of classes in each setUp/tearDown. Maybe we should use before/After[Tests as Peter suggested], and document that these should be limited to effects that live beyond the scope of the Project instance (i.e. FS, DB, etc.)? -Matt > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
