Hmm... sounds reasonable. ;) -Matt --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> before/afterTests? > > Peter > > > On 10/3/06, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > On 10/3/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > JUnit 4 and TestNG have a Before/AfterClass > concept > > > for expensive setup/tearDown applicable to most > or all > > > of a test class. AntUnit needs something > similar; > > > e.g. before/after[File|Build|Resource|All]... I > think > > > it's useful to retain the before/after > nomenclature > > > for familiarity bred from JUnit 4 and TestNG use > in > > > the community. I will implement as > before/AfterFile; > > > if folk have issues we can discuss a better > idiom. > > > > I believe JUnit3 has test decorators to do that... > > > > So you want to support a "before" and "after" > target that would be > > called before any tests run, and after all tests > are run? Why not... > > --DD > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
