Hi, I agree with Jan. I do not understand ultra compact syntax. I do not know operators precedence by heart. What I do not master at all are bitwise operations with << | & ....
Regards, Antoine -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:50:18 +0200 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: AW: AW: svn commit: r450609 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ConcatResourceInputStream.java > Sorry, I didnt know about your low-RAM-machine - I only see my strong > glasses ... ;-) > > I think a readable code is more worth than a few bytes... so I am +1 for > reverting. > > > Jan > > > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >Von: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 16:37 > >An: Ant Developers List > >Betreff: Re: AW: svn commit: r450609 - > >/ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ConcatResour > >ceInputStream.java > > > >--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >[SNIP] (RE removing parens from ternary ops) > >> What is the advantage apart from decreasing readability? > >> > > > >Sorry, just my irrational resentment of unnecessary bytes... > >we can put them back if you like and I'll try to control myself. > > > >-Matt > > > >> Jan > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
