Hello Dominique, Dominique Devienne wrote: >> >> getURL() makes sense for FileResource and ZipResource too. > > Yes, but these can be expressed as URLResource just the same. Maybe > they should in fact derive from URLResource... I do not agree with you on this. ZipResource and FileResource have the special semantics of resources which are centered on a root directory or root resource. This root is the directory of a fileset, or the whole zip file in case of ZipResource.
URLResource (s) AFAIK do not have a special "root". The root or base part of the ZipResource or FileResource change what happens when a copy is done, or a zip file gets built, ... Regards, Antoine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
