(1) Would you prefer a version of AssertTask that didn't extend ConditionBase?
Yes.
(2) Would you want AntUnit to silently typedef all existing conditions into the AntUnit namespace? People wouldn't even notice.
Yes, and no... Yes, I'd prefer it only had a add(Condition), but doing (2) might create problems for those that don't like using XML namespaces in their build file (I believe one can use AntLibs without the NS prefix). Otherwise it's safe and I like (2) as well. Better to wait for Peter's <tagdef> post 1.7. Consider this issue closed Stefan, and congrats for the AntUnit beta release. --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
