--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Matt Benson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > All: shouldn't Ant have an e.g. <refcopy> task? > > We probably never felt the need for it, but why not. > I'm not sure > about the name since copy implies cloning to me. > Something with > "alias" in its name?
1) "alias" to me implies a relationship between the _names_; which is what we have today with <foo id="x" refid="y" />. But if we decide to go this route, I'm sure we can compromise semantically. Do you (or anyone else) have an opinion on DD's assertion that the concrete use-case (modifying imported references) could be better solved by scoping imported references as targets? [1] -Matt [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=115703947632596&w=2 > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
