On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Stefan, (and other interested devs) > > For additional testing I've created a directory/file structure like > > 1/ > 1 2/ > 2 3/ > 3 4/
so much effort ... > ie a single file under a directory, the tree is 1038+ layers deep > and there is no difference between the original time taken by the > DirectoryScanner code and the modified code I assume you tried some combinations of include/excludes. Dominique used to have a big tree where any change to DirectoryScanner affected the runtime of the <sync> task considerably (<sync> needs to scan both the source and the dest tree), but that probably was part of another live of his. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
