> Which one would you prefer?  Or should we invent a new one?

Use an existing one of course. There could also be more than one,
just supported by a "language" attribute.

> We do have the "clumsy" XML expression language that we built into the
> condition task and it follows the rest of Ant's "language".

I do not see  your point why an embedded expression language would
not follow Ant's language terms. Perhaps you can elaborate on this
bit further.

> And regardless which existing language we'd chose, we'd always find 
> users who'd find it hard to use - not all Ant users are Java 
> developers and are able to read "a && b".

Users who do not understand feature are not obligied to use them and
I still  believe that users quickly get the idea what "a && b" could
mean. After all, you also need a lot of imagniation to understand 
what you can do with Ant, right?

The  only  problem with "&"  is that it is an "XML" character as 
well.

Wolfgang.





Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
25-06-2006 11:42
Please respond to
"Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>


To
dev@ant.apache.org
cc

Subject
Re: using multiple properties in the 'if' and 'unless' conditions






On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Wolfgang Häfelinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> What would so bad introducing an "expression language"? 

Which one would you prefer?  Or should we invent a new one?

We do have the "clumsy" XML expression language that we built into the
condition task and it follows the rest of Ant's "language".
Introducing a different language would mean implementing a different
interpreter for it, documenting it an all that.  And regardless which
existing language we'd chose, we'd always find users who'd find it
hard to use - not all Ant users are Java developers and are able to
read "a && b".

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to