On Wed, 10 May 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On Tue, 09 May 2006, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> As well as simplifying a common operation, it is a foundation for >>> instance specific logic to decide if an execute failed, which >>> could be of use in VMS land. >> You better check with your contacts in the OpenVMS group for some >> of your changes. The tasks executing Java VMs (this includes tasks >> running rmic or javac) explicitly checked for a 0 exit code since >> we've been told the Java VM wouldn't be playing be OpenVMS rules >> and return 0 on success. >> > > I havent actually done any vms-ready work, just wrapped up the > process of getting the return code then checking for a failure into > a method that is part of the Execute() instance.
No, you also changed ForkingJavaRmic to use isFailure() instead of the exitCode == 0 check that was in it before. If rmic returns 0 on success on OpenVMS, you've just broken the task. > Personally, I'm not 100% sure that you can have a zero-change switch > to getting something like jboss to build on OpenVMs, I agree. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
