Likewise though, couldn't you argue that if the project hasn't been
touched in years, then the chance of the project upgrading it's Ant
distribution is also slim?

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:26 AM
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: Re: Marking deprecated with since tags

On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I have started marking every @deprecated in our code with since
> tags.
> 
> Is this seen as useful.

Yes.

> And how do you look at the proposal to drop the deprecated since
> 1.4.x in 1.7?

No.

As Gump shows us there a tons of open source projects in wide-spread
use which haven't been touched in years (still don't stand the
slightest chance to compile on Java5, for example).  Removing
deprecated stuff from Ant means that a project that built fine on Ant
1.6.5 suddenly stops building in 1.7.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



**************************************************************
This message, including any attachments, contains confidential information 
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, please contact sender immediately by reply 
e-mail and destroy all copies.  You are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on 
it, is strictly prohibited.
TIAA-CREF
**************************************************************


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to