DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19845>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19845 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-21 00:37 ------- The patch can't be accepted as-is because it breaks backwards-compatibility; i.e. there could (farfetched I know) be builds in the wild that depend on this failure. What you can do is make the desired behavior conditional upon a new attribute, e.g. failonerror (default true) or the like. In the meantime you can work around this lack "old-school-Ant-style": <target name="main" depends="check,filters,nofilters"> <mycopy file="foo" tofile="bar" /> </target> <target name="check"> <available property="found" file="filtersfile" /> </target> <target name="filters" if="found"> <presetdef name="mycopy"> <copy> <filterset> <filtersfile file="filtersfile" /> </filterset> </copy> </presetdef> </target> <target name="nofilters" if="found"> <presetdef name="mycopy"> <copy /> </presetdef> </target> Okay, the presetdef isn't old-school, but the target arrangement was what I was talking about... ;) HTH, Matt P.S. if you update your patch, prepend [PATCH] to the bug summary! -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
