On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To make sure we understand each other, what I mean
> here is to allow e.g.:
> <copy resource="url:someurl" tofile="foo" />
> or something similar, IH would pass "url:someurl" to a
> ResourceHelper class or some such that would attempt
> to locate a Resource type defined as "url" and call a
> String constructor with "someurl".
Hmm, I'd prefer (ab?)using PropertyHelpers for this instead of adding
new helpers.
<copy resource="${resource:url:someurl}"/> or something similar.
> This is more useful for specifying resources for
> output than for input.
Agreed.
> This has been another of my so-odd-as-to-likely-be-unpopular ideas,
You have no idea what type of odd ideas I have for resource
collections 8-)
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
