Kev Jackson wrote:
nope, you havent missed anything.
I think we may want to extend the antlib with some extra stuff to ease
installation
-declaration of libraries that must be present (tests for classes)
-declare minimum or required ant versions
you mean something like
<antlib>
<ant required="1.6">
clearly we wouldnt reuse existing names of stuff. indeed, the names
should be
<antversion>
<required>
<major>1</major><minor>6</minor>
</required>
</antversion>
with no support for declaring point version or alpha/beta release (where
it gets complex, that and private build
<libs required="commons-logging">
no, more a test for a class existing. Actually, if you could put <fail>
into an antlib, available and typefound and the like can do most of the
work.
<fail>
<condition><not><available class="commons.logging.log"
/></not></condition>
You need commons logging
</fail>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
